Comparing davis and lincolns innagural address

In compliance with a custom as old as the Government itself, I appear before you to address you briefly and to take in your presence the oath prescribed by the Constitution of the United States to be taken by the President before he enters on the execution of this office. Apprehension seems to exist among the people of the Southern States that by the accession of a Republican Administration their property and their peace and personal security are to be endangered. There has never been any reasonable cause for such apprehension.

Comparing davis and lincolns innagural address

In a tribute to the 51, Americans that had been killed, injured or lost in the JulyBattle of Gettysburg, Abraham Lincoln in his November 19, Gettysburg Address declared that "this nation under God shall have a new birth of freedom, and that government of the people, by the people, for the people shall not perish from the earth.

He gave the battle a transcendental sense by transforming the battle into a statement of principle. His Address effectively reinterpreted the Constitution to accurately reflect the Declaration of Independencethat all men are created equal.

It was left to the unlikely figure of President Abraham Lincoln to recognize the Christian culture of our Nation. He stated that "the Almighty has his own purposes. He then lays the blame for the tragedy on both North and South: Lincoln took the Declaration of Independence literally, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain God-given rights, among them Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness.

The Thirteenth through Fifteenth Amendments to the U. Constitution were added as a result of the Civil War to end slaveryto provide equal protection to all that were defined as citizensand to grant the vote to former slaves The first circulating currency to bear the phrase In God We Trust was the two-cent coin of Now we are engaged in a great civil war, testing whether that nation or any nation so conceived and so dedicated can long endure.

We are met on a great battlefield of that war. We have come to dedicate a portion of that field as a final resting-place for those who here gave their lives that that nation might live. It is altogether fitting and proper that we should do this.

But in a larger sense, we cannot dedicate, we cannot consecrate, we cannot hallow this ground. The brave men, living and dead who struggled here have consecrated it far above our poor power to add or detract. The world will little note nor long remember what we say here, but it can never forget what they did here.

It is for us the living rather to be dedicated here to the unfinished work which they who fought here have thus far so nobly advanced. It is rather for us to be here dedicated to the great task remaining before us - that from these honored dead we take increased devotion to that cause for which they gave the last full measure of devotion - that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain - that this nation under God shall have a new birth of freedom, and that government of the people, by the people, for the people shall not perish from the earth.

Then a statement somewhat in detail of a course to be pursued seemed fitting and proper. Now, at the expiration of four years, during which public declarations have been constantly called forth on every point and phase of the great contest which still absorbs the attention and engrosses the energies of the nation, little that is new could be presented.

The progress of our arms, upon which all else chiefly depends, is as well known to the public as to myself, and it is, I trust, reasonably satisfactory and encouraging to all. With high hope for the future, no prediction in regard to it is ventured. On the occasion corresponding to this four years ago all thoughts were anxiously directed to an impending civil war.

All dreaded it, all sought to avert it. While the inaugural address was being delivered from this place, devoted altogether to saving the Union without war, insurgent agents were in the city seeking to destroy it without war - seeking to dissolve the Union and divide effects by negotiation.

Both parties deprecated war, but one of them would make war rather than let the nation survive, and the other would accept war rather than let it perish, and the war came.

One-eighth of the whole population were colored slaves, not distributed generally over the Union, but localized in the southern part of it. These slaves constituted a peculiar and powerful interest. All knew that this interest was somehow the cause of the war. To strengthen, perpetuate, and extend this interest was the object for which the insurgents would rend the Union even by war, while the Government claimed no right to do more than to restrict the territorial enlargement of it.

Neither party expected for the war the magnitude or the duration which it has already attained. Neither anticipated that the cause of the conflict might cease with or even before the conflict itself should cease. Each looked for an easier triumph, and a result less fundamental and astounding.

Both read the same Bible and pray to the same God, and each invokes His aid against the other. The prayers of both could not be answered. That of neither has been answered fully.

The Almighty has His own purposes.

Comparing Davis and Lincoln's Innagural Address | Essay Example

Fondly do we hope, fervently do we pray, that this mighty scourge of war may speedily pass away.Library of Congress. Second Inaugural Address Washington, D.C. March 4, This theologically intense speech has been widely acknowledged as one of the most remarkable documents in American history.

Comparing davis and lincolns innagural address

(This is an original essay) Kaitlyn Alyse Norton Ms. Wright English Expository Writing 4 November Inaugural Address President Abraham Lincoln and President John F. Kennedy were both wonderful presidents, but not without their flaws. Comparing Davis and Lincoln's Innagural Address American history, led by Abraham Lincoln for the north, and Jefferson Davis for the south, both presidents, but two different sides.

Both garner for peace, yet one is willing to start a war, while the other is willing to accept it. Comparing Davis and Lincoln’s Innagural Address Essay Sample. The bloodiest war in American history, led by Abraham Lincoln for the north, and Jefferson Davis . First Inaugural Address of Abraham Lincoln.

MONDAY, MARCH 4, In compliance with a custom as old as the Government itself, I appear before you to address you briefly and to take in your presence the oath prescribed by the Constitution of the United States to be taken by the President before he enters on the execution of this office.".

Comparing Davis and Lincoln's Innagural Address Words Aug 22nd, 6 Pages The bloodiest war in American history, led by Abraham Lincoln for the north, and Jefferson Davis for the south, both presidents, but two different sides.

Comparing davis and lincolns innagural address
Comparing Davis and Lincoln's Innagural Address | Essay Example